Terminology Mix-Up Inflates Complaint Numbers at Moscow Campus
The University of Idaho reported 139 Title IX complaints during the 12-month period ending in June, a figure that initially appears alarming compared to the combined 36 complaints filed across Idaho’s seven other state colleges and universities. However, the university has clarified that a terminology error in its submission inflated the numbers, and the actual number of formal investigations aligns closely with peer institutions statewide.
Under Idaho state law, all colleges and universities must file annual Title IX compliance reports by July 1. The reports document complaints related to sex-based discrimination and harassment covered under Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in educational institutions. The discrepancy between the University of Idaho’s reported figure and other state schools prompted questions about whether the Moscow campus was experiencing a substantially higher rate of misconduct.
The university’s official statement clarified that the inflated count resulted from how complaints were categorized and counted in the filing. The distinction is significant: multiple reports can be filed regarding the same incident, and most initial reports do not progress to formal Title IX investigations. When accounting for the university’s actual investigation numbers, the figures align with what other state institutions are seeing.
Russ Rivera, director of the University of Idaho Office of Civil Rights and Investigations, noted the challenge of his office’s public perception. “We’re viewed as kind of a scary office, and I think the goal for me is to try and change that,” he said in response to the reporting error.
What Title IX Covers
Title IX applies specifically to students and staff within educational institutions. Reports filed under the statute do not include complaints from outside community members unless they directly involve students or employees. This distinction is important when interpreting the raw complaint numbers, as they reflect only eligible complainants under the law’s scope.
The university’s clarification underscores a broader point about Title IX data reporting: raw complaint figures can be misleading without context about how those complaints are defined, counted, and processed. A single incident involving multiple parties might generate several separate reports, each counted in the annual filing.
What Comes Next
The University of Idaho’s Title IX reports, along with those from other state colleges and universities, are available on the Idaho Legislature’s website for public review. The university has indicated it will ensure future filings use consistent and accurate terminology to prevent similar confusion. The clarification should help provide a more accurate picture of Title IX compliance and investigation activity across Idaho’s higher education system.
For more on the University of Idaho, see Idaho Football Enters Year 2 Under Ford With Refocused Philosophy, New Staff and University of Idaho Seeks Community Help for August Move-In Day.